|   |  |   
  
    
      |  |  | Seeing
        Red Over Purple Pensby Mad Dog
 
 
 |  
      | In a show of
        educational Kumbaya-ism not seen since English became Language Arts,
        teachers are dumping their red pens faster than plans for Gigli II and
        grading students’ papers using purple ones.
 |  | It’s back-to-school time
        once again. Children are looking forward to reuniting with old friends,
        making new ones, enriching their growing minds, and wearing brand new
        Nikes courtesy of the second mortgage Mom and Dad had to take out to pay
        for them. Oh yeah, and running home excitedly, not being able to wait to
        show off the test that was handed back with only a couple of small
        corrections marked in purple.    Purple? Yes, purple. In a show of
        educational Kumbaya-ism not seen since English became Language Arts and
        self-esteem replaced “go to the principal’s office” as the Mantra
        of Discipline, teachers are dumping their red pens faster than plans for
        Gigli II and grading students’ papers using purple ones. They
        say they’re doing this because purple’s “not as scary,”
        “friendlier,” and “goes better with their new fall outfits.”
        Just kidding about the last one, though it would be a better
        justification than the one they’re giving, which is that marking
        errors in red has a “negative connotation.” Excuse me, but if you
        find red marks on your paper it is negative. It’s supposed to be. It
        means you made mistakes. And you should want to know about them. Red
        stands out so you can easily see it. Not to mention that teachers have
        been correcting in red since the 1700s without causing undue harm to
        billions of children. Okay, except maybe for John Wayne Gacy, Ted Bundy,
        and George Bush, but hey, there are exceptions to every rule.
 
 |  
      | If the color
        purple is everything it’s cracked up to be, maybe the Department of
        Homeland Security (motto: “Scaring citizens since 2003”) should look
        into it.
 |  | According to a story in the Boston Globe, the reason
        purple is good for grading papers is that it’s a mixture of red and
        blue, so it has “red’s sense of authority but also blue’s
        association with serenity.” That’s all well and good, but it
        doesn’t take into account whether a student is in the fall, winter,
        spring, or summer color group, and there’s no telling what kind of
        psychic clash could occur should a winter student get a purple-graded
        test back. We could be talking about remedial self-esteem classes for
        life. Not to mention lawsuits that would make Mark Geragos salivate. On
        the other hand, the adoption of across-the-board purple grading would
        force schools to hire color consultants to make sure this doesn’t
        happen. This would be a big boost for the economy, especially since none
        of them have had anything even remotely resembling steady work since
        1987.    If the color purple is everything
        it’s cracked up to be, maybe the Department of Homeland Security
        (motto: “Scaring citizens since 2003”) should look into it. As you
        know, for reasons which are best explained by the word
        “bureaucracy,” they chose red to represent the highest security
        level. Now were they to actually announce a red alert, there’s no
        question it would cause a lot of panic, anxiety, and a run on sheet
        plastic and duct tape. However, were they to use purple to indicate that
        level, it would give the warning a red sense of authority combined with
        that well-known blue sense of serenity, resulting in our feeling much
        more relaxed when we look at the woman next door and wonder whether
        she’s actually pregnant or could that be a dirty bomb she’s hiding
        under her shirt.    I’m sure a study’s already been
        launched to determine whether the use of purple pens to grade papers
        results in fewer self-esteem problems, higher grades, students ordering
        more eggplant in the cafeteria, and an increase in wearing purple while
        marching in the Gay Pride Parade. After all, if it can make us better,
        more level-headed people throughout life it’s a good thing. Who knows,
        it might even stop the recent rash of parking lot brawls involving old
        men. I mean, cranky senior citizens.
 
 |  
      | It’s downright cruel to make any child think they failed,
        no matter how badly they did. That’s why the new system should be
        pass/passable. And letter grades should only include A, B, and C.
 |  | I’m not kidding. A while back two men in Boca Raton, Florida
        got into a fight over a parking space at Denny’s. It ended when the
        youngster, who was 73, stuck his cane out the car window and hit the
        other guy, who was 80. Then last week a 69-year-old German man stabbed a
        rival dentist during an argument over patient parking spaces. Could this
        violence be rooted in the indiscriminate use of red to grade papers when
        they were growing up? Or does it say something about parking lots and
        how no one over the age of 65 should be allowed to use them?    If we’re worried about our children
        being harmed by red corrections, we should at least be consistent.
        Teachers should stop using gold and silver stars because it creates a
        caste system, not to mention that since stars, like our money, are no
        longer backed by gold, they have very little intrinsic value. Then
        there’s the fact that some years silver is more fashionable than gold.
        If silver is this year’s gold, who in their right, trendful mind would
        want a gold star? It would feel like you’re getting dissed instead of
        using a proper word like praised. Of course I may be way behind the
        times about this. I wouldn’t be surprised if they stopped using stars
        years ago, right about the same time they started insisting that every
        child give a Valentine’s Day card to every other child, even if they
        hate their guts. Hey, you wouldn’t want anyone to feel left out and
        unloved because there wasn’t a show of forced, unfelt affection, would
        you?    While we’re at it, why not
        eliminate grades altogether? Low grades breed low self-esteem, and
        pass/fail — well, it’s just way too, uh, red. It’s downright cruel
        to make any child think they failed, no matter how badly they did.
        That’s why the new system should be pass/passable. And letter grades
        should only include A, B, and C. Between these suggestions and purple
        grading, it won’t be long before we eradicate low self-esteem, the
        world will be at peace, and someone will come up with a study that
        proves purple turns kids into serial killers. It’s enough to make you
        see red. ©2004 Mad Dog
        Productions, Inc. All Rights Reserved.These columns appear in better newspapers across the country. If
        you find any misakes, correct them with a red pen.
  |  
 |